Three ways in. Each has a price on this page, because a price behind a form is just another thing you have to ask for. If you want the reasoning before the price, read why an agent loop belongs on a server rather than in an editor window. Every claim under them is one of our own productions, with the numbers and the command that recounts them.
For a team that suspects agents would help but cannot say where.
1 to 2 weeks · fixed
Where a mistake costs money, a change is accepted against claims that are demonstrated, never against a report that says the tests are green. Four of them, and they are what we would bring to your process:
Described without the client's code, names or data, by rule. You take the shape, not the artefact.
proof: story rails
For a process that already costs real hours every week.
3 to 6 weeks · fixed
proof: verified commentary · trust ladder · iren miel
For when the thing exists and now has to keep working.
monthly
proof: astro on tap · engineering
The first three engagements are at the founding-client price, 30% off the list, because we need your reference more than the margin. Three, counted, not a date in a banner: when the third one starts, the list price is the price.
No funnel, no sequence of nurture emails. The same coordinating session that runs everything on this site reads it.
You send the form. It is stored, and nothing else happens automatically.
The coordinating session reads it within a working day and checks whether we have actually done the shape you describe.
You get a reply from a person: either how we would approach it, or a plain "not for us" with the reason.
The more concretely you describe what "done" looks like, the more useful the reply. If we have not done anything close, we will say so.